What Is Organizational Development and Why It Matters

A practical executive guide to strengthening organizational capability, performance, culture, and adaptability

Prepared for executives, business owners, HR leaders, L&D professionals, department heads, and organizational decision makers across the GCC.

Contents

1. Executive Introduction

2. What Is Organizational Development?

3. Why Organizational Development Matters

4. Common Organizational Challenges

5. The ALIGN Organizational Development Framework

6. Best Practices

7. Common Misconceptions

8. Measuring Success

9. Frequently Asked Questions

10. Key Takeaways

11. About Creation International

1. Executive Introduction

Organizational development (OD) is a systematic, evidence-informed approach to improving how an organization functions. It helps leaders strengthen the alignment between strategy, structure, leadership, people, culture, processes, and capabilities so that the organization can perform effectively today and adapt successfully tomorrow.

OD matters because many performance problems are not caused by a lack of employee effort or technical knowledge. They often arise from unclear priorities, inconsistent leadership, poorly designed roles, fragmented processes, weak collaboration, conflicting incentives, or cultures that unintentionally discourage accountability and learning. Training may help individuals build skills, but it cannot by itself repair an organizational system that makes the right behaviour difficult to sustain.

For organizations in the UAE and across the GCC, organizational development is especially relevant during growth, national transformation, digitalization, restructuring, leadership transitions, mergers, workforce localization, service improvement, and expansion into new markets. These situations increase complexity. Without deliberate alignment, growth can create duplicated work, slower decisions, uneven management practices, and a widening gap between strategic ambition and operational reality.

Organizations invest in OD to diagnose root causes before selecting solutions, strengthen organizational capability rather than treat isolated symptoms, and create conditions in which people can perform. Effective OD is not a one-time workshop or a collection of HR activities. It is a disciplined process of diagnosis, design, implementation, learning, and reinforcement. Its purpose is sustainable organizational effectiveness: stronger performance, healthier ways of working, better leadership, and greater capacity to respond to change.

2. What Is Organizational Development?

Organizational development is a planned and collaborative process for increasing organizational effectiveness and health through changes to strategy execution, structures, leadership practices, culture, people systems, team dynamics, processes, and capabilities.

The field draws on organizational psychology, behavioural science, systems thinking, change management, leadership development, human resource management, process improvement, adult learning, and strategy execution. Its defining characteristic is that it examines the organization as an interconnected system. A change in one area, such as reporting lines, performance measures, decision rights, or leadership behaviour, can create intended and unintended effects elsewhere.

Organizational development in business context

In practical business terms, OD helps leaders answer questions such as:

·    Are our structure and decision rights suitable for our strategy and stage of growth?

·    Do managers consistently translate strategic priorities into clear expectations?

·    Are teams collaborating across functions or protecting departmental boundaries?

·    Do performance, reward, talent, and learning systems reinforce the behaviours we need?

·    What cultural norms help performance, and which norms create risk?

·    Do we have the leadership and workforce capabilities required for future priorities?

·    Why are improvement initiatives producing activity without sustained results?

The purpose of organizational development

The purpose of OD is not change for its own sake. It is to improve the organization’s capacity to achieve its mission and strategic objectives while maintaining a healthy, ethical, and sustainable work environment. This involves improving both performance and organizational health.

Why organizations invest in OD

·    To align the operating model with strategic priorities.

·    To improve accountability, role clarity, and decision-making.

·    To strengthen leadership and management consistency.

·    To improve collaboration across departments, locations, or business units.

·    To support transformation, integration, restructuring, or rapid growth.

·    To address cultural patterns affecting trust, innovation, customer experience, or execution.

·    To build sustainable capability rather than dependence on a few key individuals.

·    To ensure learning, talent, and performance systems produce measurable business value.

3. Why Organizational Development Matters

Organizational development matters because performance is produced by a system. Individual competence is important, but people act within structures, priorities, processes, technologies, leadership practices, incentives, and social norms. When these elements are aligned, capable employees can perform consistently. When they conflict, even highly committed employees spend energy navigating ambiguity and friction.

Business impact

OD strengthens the organization’s ability to execute strategy. It can reduce duplication, shorten decision cycles, clarify accountability, improve coordination, and increase the reliability of service or operational delivery. It also helps leaders direct resources toward the causes of performance gaps rather than repeatedly funding disconnected initiatives.

People impact

Healthy organizational systems make expectations clearer and work more manageable. Employees understand how their role contributes, where decisions sit, how to collaborate, and what good performance looks like. This supports engagement and wellbeing, but OD should not be reduced to an engagement initiative. Engagement is one outcome of a credible organizational environment; it cannot compensate for poor design or inconsistent leadership.

Leadership impact

OD makes leadership expectations visible and actionable. It helps senior leaders align messages, managers translate priorities, and teams establish effective routines. It also exposes where leaders may unintentionally reinforce silos, escalate unnecessary decisions, avoid difficult conversations, or reward short-term results at the expense of long-term capability.

Organizational impact

At an organizational level, OD builds adaptability. Organizations become better at sensing risks, learning from evidence, making coordinated changes, and embedding new ways of working. This is particularly important in sectors facing regulatory change, technological disruption, workforce transformation, or ambitious growth agendas.

4. Common Organizational Challenges

Organizations rarely struggle because leaders lack good intentions. They struggle because complex problems are simplified too quickly, symptoms are treated as causes, and interventions are launched before the operating environment is understood.

Starting with a solution instead of a diagnosis

A request for training, restructuring, technology, or team building is accepted at face value. The intervention may be useful, but it does not address the conditions producing the problem.

Treating OD as an HR-only responsibility

HR may facilitate the process, but organizational effectiveness depends on business ownership. Leaders must make decisions about priorities, structure, governance, resources, and behaviour.

Confusing activity with progress

Workshops, surveys, communication campaigns, and new frameworks create visible activity. Without agreed outcomes, ownership, and reinforcement, activity does not necessarily produce change.

Focusing on individuals while ignoring the system

Employees are asked to become more accountable or collaborative, while decision rights remain unclear, incentives compete, or leaders continue to override agreed processes.

Designing at the top without involving the work

Senior leaders may define a future operating model without learning how work actually flows. Frontline and middle-management insight is essential for practical design.

Ignoring middle managers

Middle managers translate change into daily behaviour. If they lack clarity, authority, skill, or time, implementation becomes inconsistent.

Measuring perceptions only

Surveys provide valuable insight, but perceptions should be combined with operational data, behavioural evidence, interviews, and workflow analysis.

Ending after launch

New structures and values are announced, but routines, measures, capability building, and leadership follow-through do not change. The organization returns to familiar habits.

Warning signs that OD may be needed

·    Strategic priorities are repeatedly communicated but interpreted differently across functions.

·    Decisions are delayed, escalated unnecessarily, or revisited after agreement.

·    Roles overlap, accountability is unclear, or important work falls between departments.

·    The same performance problems continue despite repeated training or coaching.

·    Leaders describe the culture one way while employees experience another.

·    Growth has increased complexity faster than systems and management capability have matured.

·    Change initiatives depend on a few committed individuals and fade when attention moves elsewhere.

·    Customer, employee, quality, or operational data point to related problems that are managed separately.

5. The ALIGN Organizational Development Framework

A strong OD process moves from evidence to alignment and from design to sustained capability. The ALIGN framework provides a practical six-stage approach suitable for organization-wide initiatives, business units, departments, or cross-functional challenges.

A — Agree the purpose and outcomes

·    Clarify the business issue, strategic context, scope, and sponsorship.

·    Define what success should look like in business, behavioural, and organizational terms.

·    Identify affected stakeholders and decision makers.

·    Establish principles for participation, confidentiality, communication, and evidence use.

·    Confirm what is inside and outside the initiative’s scope.

Output: a clear case for action, governance structure, and outcome measures.

L — Listen to the organizational system

·    Gather multiple forms of evidence: interviews, focus groups, surveys, performance data, process observation, customer insight, and document review.

·    Examine formal systems, structure, policies, workflows, measures and informal systems norms, relationships, influence, and unwritten rules.

·    Include perspectives from senior leaders, middle managers, employees, customers, and key partners where relevant.

·    Look for patterns, contradictions, strengths, and variations across units.

Output: a credible evidence base describing how the organization currently operates.

I — Identify root causes and strategic priorities

·    Distinguish symptoms from causes using systems thinking and structured root-cause analysis.

·    Test whether issues relate to clarity, capability, capacity, motivation, process, technology, governance, leadership, or culture.

·    Identify leverage points where a focused change could improve several outcomes.

·    Prioritize issues according to strategic impact, urgency, feasibility, and risk.

Output: a shared diagnosis and a limited set of high-value priorities.

G — Generate and implement integrated solutions

·    Co-design interventions with the people responsible for implementation.

·    Combine solutions across the system rather than relying on one intervention.

·    Pilot where uncertainty is high and use feedback to refine the design.

·    Assign ownership, resources, milestones, and decision rights.

·    Build leadership and manager capability alongside process or structural changes.

Output: an integrated change portfolio and practical implementation roadmap.

N — Normalize and sustain new ways of working

·    Embed expectations into leadership routines, performance management, onboarding, talent processes, meetings, and measures.

·    Provide reinforcement through coaching, feedback, communities of practice, and manager follow-up.

·    Monitor adoption, behavioural consistency, and business outcomes.

·    Address unintended consequences and remove barriers quickly.

·    Transfer ownership from the project team into normal governance.

Output: new practices become part of how the organization operates, not a temporary initiative.

Examples of integrated OD interventions

6. Best Practices

Begin with the business strategy

OD should be anchored in what the organization must achieve and the capabilities required to achieve it. Avoid broad culture or engagement programmes that are disconnected from strategic priorities.

Use multiple sources of evidence

Combine quantitative and qualitative evidence. Operational measures show what is happening; interviews and observation help explain why.

Involve leaders as owners, not audiences

Executives and managers should participate in diagnosis, choices, modelling, and reinforcement. OD cannot be delegated entirely to HR or consultants.

Engage the people closest to the work

Employees often understand workflow barriers, customer friction, and informal dependencies better than formal charts reveal. Participation also improves design quality and ownership.

Build on strengths as well as problems

Diagnosis should identify what already works. Existing strengths, relationships, and successful local practices can become platforms for wider improvement.

Design a coherent portfolio

Structural, process, leadership, learning, communication, and people-system interventions should reinforce one another. A collection of unrelated initiatives increases fatigue.

Treat middle management as a critical capability

Provide managers with context, tools, authority, coaching, and realistic capacity. They should not be expected to implement major change on top of unchanged workloads without support.

Make behaviour observable

Translate values and aspirations into specific actions. For example, “collaboration” may include involving affected functions early, sharing relevant information, challenging respectfully, and honouring agreed decisions.

Pilot, learn, and adapt

Where possible, test new routines or operating-model elements in a limited area. Use evidence to improve before scaling.

Plan reinforcement from the beginning

Sustainability depends on governance, leadership routines, measures, systems, and consequences. Reinforcement is not a final communication activity; it is part of the design.

7. Common Misconceptions

“Organizational development is the same as training.”

Training develops knowledge, skill, or confidence. OD may include training, but it also addresses structures, processes, leadership, culture, systems, and work design. Training is appropriate when capability is a genuine cause; it is insufficient when the environment prevents application.

“OD is mainly about culture and employee engagement.”

Culture and engagement are important, but OD is broader. It connects human experience with strategy, governance, operating models, performance, and organizational capability.

“OD is only needed when an organization is failing.”

High-performing organizations use OD proactively to prepare for growth, new technology, succession, service innovation, or emerging strategic priorities.

“A new structure will solve the problem.”

Structure can clarify accountability, but changing boxes and reporting lines does not automatically improve behaviour, capability, processes, or decision quality.

“Once leaders communicate the change, implementation is complete.”

Communication builds awareness and understanding. Adoption requires capability, opportunity, reinforcement, feedback, and changes to daily routines and systems.

“OD takes too long to create value.”

Comprehensive transformation can take time, but disciplined OD often produces early value by clarifying priorities, removing bottlenecks, improving decisions, or stopping low-value activity.

“A survey provides the diagnosis.”

A survey is one source of evidence. It should be interpreted alongside operational data, interviews, observation, process analysis, and strategic context.

“Consultants can deliver OD to the organization.”

External experts can bring methods, independence, and challenge, but sustainable OD requires internal ownership. The organization must make choices, model behaviours, and embed new practices.

8. Measuring Success

OD success should be measured at several levels. A single engagement score or programme-completion rate cannot demonstrate organizational improvement. Measures should reflect the original business case and track both implementation and outcomes.

Practical principles for evaluation

·    Establish baseline data before major interventions wherever possible.

·    Use a balanced set of leading indicators such as adoption and behaviour and lagging indicators such as productivity or customer outcomes.

·    Disaggregate results by function, location, management level, or workforce group to identify variation.

·    Compare changes with relevant operational events and avoid claiming causation without reasonable evidence.

·    Use evaluation as a learning process. Measures should guide adaptation, not merely prove that the initiative succeeded.

·    Assign ownership for each measure and integrate reporting into existing business governance.

What success looks like

A successful OD initiative produces more than positive feedback. Leaders make more consistent decisions; roles and priorities are clearer; teams collaborate with less friction; managers reinforce expected behaviours; systems support rather than contradict the change; and business indicators move in the intended direction. Most importantly, the organization becomes more capable of diagnosing and improving itself.

9. Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the difference between organizational development and organizational change?

Organizational change refers broadly to a shift in strategy, structure, technology, process, or behaviour. Organizational development is a disciplined approach used to diagnose, design, implement, and sustain improvements in organizational effectiveness and health. Change may be imposed by external events or initiated internally; OD provides methods for understanding the system, involving stakeholders, building capability, and aligning interventions. In practice, change management often focuses on helping people adopt a defined change, while OD may also question whether the proposed change is the right solution and how different elements of the organization need to evolve together.

2. Is organizational development part of HR?

OD is often located within HR, people and culture, strategy, transformation, or a dedicated organizational effectiveness function. However, it should not be treated as an HR-owned activity. The issues OD addresses strategy execution, governance, structure, leadership, processes, culture, and capability require business decisions and executive sponsorship. HR can provide expertise, facilitation, data, and integration with talent systems. Business leaders must own the outcomes, make trade-offs, model expected behaviours, and remove barriers. The most effective model is usually a partnership between senior leadership, line management, HR or OD professionals, employees, and relevant specialist functions.

3. When should an organization consider an OD intervention?

OD is appropriate when performance or transformation challenges appear to involve several connected factors rather than one isolated skill gap. Common triggers include rapid growth, restructuring, mergers, digital transformation, leadership transitions, persistent cross-functional conflict, weak accountability, inconsistent customer experience, unclear decision rights, or repeated initiatives that fail to sustain. OD can also be proactive. Organizations may use it to prepare for future capabilities, strengthen succession, redesign operating models, or build a more adaptive culture before problems become urgent.

4. How long does organizational development take?

The duration depends on scope, complexity, readiness, and the depth of change required. A focused departmental diagnostic and improvement cycle may take several months. Organization-wide culture or operating-model transformation may require one to three years of sustained work. OD should not be equated with a long project before value appears. Early improvements such as clearer decisions, reduced duplication, or stronger management routines can often be achieved within weeks or months. The important distinction is between launching an intervention and embedding it. Sustainable change requires enough time for new behaviours, systems, and governance to become normal practice.

5. What are the most common organizational development interventions?

Interventions may include organizational diagnostics, strategy alignment, operating-model design, role and decision-right clarification, leadership-team development, culture work, process redesign, team effectiveness, performance-management improvement, capability academies, talent and succession systems, employee listening, change enablement, and cross-functional collaboration. The correct intervention depends on the diagnosis. Effective OD rarely relies on a single activity. For example, improving accountability may require clearer roles, better objectives, manager capability, aligned measures, and consistent consequences not only an accountability workshop.

6. How is organizational culture connected to OD?

Culture is the pattern of shared assumptions, norms, and behaviours that shape how work is actually done. OD helps organizations understand which cultural patterns support strategy and which create friction or risk. Culture cannot be changed through values statements alone. It is reinforced by what leaders model, what gets rewarded, how decisions are made, who is promoted, what is tolerated, and how systems operate. Therefore, culture work should be connected to leadership behaviour, structures, processes, performance systems, and everyday routines.

7. Can training solve organizational performance problems?

Training can solve problems caused by a genuine lack of knowledge, skill, or confidence. It cannot solve unclear strategy, conflicting priorities, poor process design, inadequate resources, weak leadership follow-through, or incentives that reward the wrong behaviour. Before commissioning training, organizations should determine whether people know what to do, are able to do it, have the opportunity and resources to do it, and are reinforced for doing it. Where several conditions are missing, training should form part of a broader OD response.

8. What role do senior leaders play in OD?

Senior leaders establish the strategic case, make decisions, allocate resources, align messages, and model the behaviours expected from others. Their role is not limited to approving the initiative or attending a launch. Leaders must examine how their own routines, decisions, and relationships affect the system. They also need to remain aligned when difficult trade-offs arise. Visible inconsistency at the top quickly weakens credibility. Effective sponsorship combines direction with participation: leaders set boundaries while remaining open to evidence and stakeholder insight.

9. Why do organizational development initiatives fail?

Common causes include weak diagnosis, unclear outcomes, fragmented interventions, insufficient executive ownership, failure to engage middle managers, overreliance on communication, lack of resources, and absence of reinforcement. Some initiatives fail because the organization attempts to change behaviour without changing the conditions that shape it. Others create too many priorities at once. OD is more likely to succeed when leaders agree on the problem, focus on a small number of leverage points, involve affected stakeholders, align systems, monitor adoption, and adapt based on evidence.

10. How can small and medium-sized organizations use OD?

OD does not require a large transformation office. Smaller organizations can apply the same principles with proportionate methods. A focused process may involve clarifying strategic priorities, interviewing key employees and customers, mapping critical workflows, identifying role or decision gaps, agreeing a few improvement priorities, and reviewing progress monthly. SMEs often benefit quickly because leadership access is direct and changes can be tested faster. However, they may also depend heavily on founders or a few specialists, so succession, delegation, process discipline, and management capability are common priorities.

11. What is the relationship between OD and leadership development?

Leadership development builds the capability of leaders; OD ensures the organizational environment enables and reinforces effective leadership. The two are strongest when integrated. A leadership programme may teach delegation, feedback, collaboration, or strategic thinking. OD connects these capabilities to role expectations, decision rights, management routines, performance measures, and senior-leader modelling. Without this integration, participants may return to systems that reward old behaviour. Conversely, redesigning structures without developing leaders can create new responsibilities that managers are not prepared to fulfil.

12. How should GCC organizations approach OD?

Organizations in the GCC should apply international OD principles while adapting to their specific strategy, workforce composition, sector, governance, ownership model, language, and national priorities. There is no single “GCC culture” or universal intervention. Many organizations operate with diverse, multilingual workforces and rapid growth, making clarity, inclusive communication, management consistency, and cross-cultural collaboration especially important. Government entities, family businesses, multinational companies, and fast-growing private enterprises each require different approaches. Diagnosis should therefore precede assumptions, and interventions should be designed with local stakeholders.

13. How do we select an organizational development consultant?

Look for a consultant who begins with questions and evidence rather than a predetermined product. Strong practitioners should understand strategy, business operations, leadership, people systems, culture, and change. They should be able to explain their diagnostic approach, involve internal stakeholders, challenge respectfully, protect confidentiality, and translate findings into practical decisions. Ask how they will transfer capability to your organization, measure progress, and adapt when evidence changes. Avoid providers who promise culture transformation through workshops alone or present a standard framework before understanding the context.

14. What should an organizational development diagnosis include?

A diagnosis should examine the business context and the connected factors influencing performance. Depending on scope, this may include strategy clarity, structure, governance, decision rights, leadership behaviour, workforce capability, capacity, processes, technology, culture, collaboration, performance systems, customer experience, and external constraints. It should use multiple evidence sources and distinguish facts, perceptions, hypotheses, and assumptions. A useful diagnosis does not simply produce a long list of issues; it identifies root causes, strengths, dependencies, leverage points, and a manageable set of priorities.

15. How do we sustain OD results after the project ends?

Sustainability begins during design. New behaviours and practices should be embedded in normal leadership routines, performance management, onboarding, talent processes, governance, measures, and resource decisions. Managers need tools, authority, coaching, and feedback. Internal owners should gradually take responsibility for facilitation and monitoring. Leaders must continue modelling expectations and addressing barriers. Periodic reviews help the organization learn and adapt. The strongest sign of sustainability is not that every original activity continues, but that the organization can maintain outcomes and improve the system without ongoing dependence on the project team.

16. What Does Organizational Development Consulting Involve?

Organizational development consulting involves helping an organization improve how it functions as a whole. It goes beyond training by examining the systems, structures, leadership practices, roles, culture, processes, and capabilities that influence organizational performance.

A typical organizational development engagement may involve:

• Diagnosing organizational challenges and root causes

• Reviewing structure, roles, responsibilities, and decision rights

• Assessing leadership and management capability

• Improving cross-functional collaboration and accountability

• Identifying culture and behavioural barriers

• Strengthening performance management and workplace practices

• Clarifying capabilities required for future strategy

• Supporting organizational change and transformation

• Designing targeted leadership, coaching, training, or team interventions

• Creating implementation plans and measuring progress

The exact scope should depend on the business problem.

For example, if an organization is experiencing low accountability, the issue may not be a lack of accountability training. It may also involve unclear ownership, inconsistent management follow-up, conflicting priorities, weak decision rights, or organizational systems that reinforce the wrong behaviours.

This is why effective organizational development consulting should begin with diagnosis rather than a preselected solution.

Organizational Development Consulting vs Training

17. When Should an Organization Consider OD Consulting?

Organizational development consulting may be appropriate when:

• Organizational growth is creating unclear roles or responsibilities

• Decisions are slow or repeatedly escalated

• Departments operate in silos

• Accountability is inconsistent

• Leadership teams are not aligned

• Workplace culture is affecting performance

• Organizational change is not translating into new behaviours

• Management capability varies significantly across departments

• Training repeatedly fails to solve the same problem

• The organization needs to strengthen capability for future strategy

Creation International supports organizations through organizational development, management consultancy, leadership and management development, coaching, assessment, team effectiveness, and capability development in Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Sharjah and across the UAE and in Riyadh, Jeddah, Khobar, Dammam, Muscat, Doha, Bahrain, Kuwait, Iraq and wider GCC.

The approach begins with understanding the business problem and identifying whether the required solution is training, coaching, consulting, organizational development, assessment, process clarification, or a combination of interventions.

10. Key Takeaways

·    Organizational development is a systematic approach to improving organizational effectiveness, health, and future capability.

·    It treats performance as the product of an interconnected system not simply individual effort or skill.

·    Diagnosis should precede solutions. Repeated training, restructuring, or communication will not solve a wrongly defined problem.

·    OD connects strategy with structure, leadership, processes, people systems, culture, and capability.

·    Business leaders must own OD outcomes; HR and OD specialists facilitate expertise and integration.

·    Effective interventions are usually integrated and address several reinforcing conditions.

·    Middle managers are critical because they translate organizational intentions into daily priorities and behaviour.

·    Success requires observable behaviours, aligned systems, practical measures, and reinforcement beyond launch.

·    Evaluation should track implementation, adoption, behaviour, organizational health, business outcomes, and sustainability.

·    The ultimate goal is an organization that can learn, adapt, and improve itself.

11. About Creation International

Creation International approaches organizational development as a process of strategic diagnosis and sustainable capability building. The starting point is not a predetermined workshop, framework, or consulting product. It is a structured understanding of the organization’s context, priorities, performance requirements, and the conditions influencing people’s ability to succeed.

Our approach considers how leadership, structure, decision-making, culture, processes, team effectiveness, learning, and people systems interact.

This helps distinguish capability gaps from organizational barriers and supports interventions that are proportionate to the evidence. Depending on the need, the response may include executive consultation, organizational diagnostics, leadership and management development, team effectiveness, facilitated alignment, coaching, learning strategy, or wider organizational improvement support.

The emphasis is on tailored interventions, evidence-informed practice, practical implementation, and capability transfer. Sustainable improvement occurs when leaders and managers can continue reinforcing effective practices after the formal intervention ends. For this reason, diagnosis, stakeholder involvement, workplace application, follow-up, and measurement are treated as essential parts of development not optional additions.

Useful links

Leadership & Management Consultancy

https://www.creationintl.com/service-page/leadership-management-consultancy?referral=service_list_widget

Training Needs Analysis

https://www.creationintl.com/service-page/training-needs-analysis?referral=service_list_widget

Team Effectiveness Consultancy

https://www.creationintl.com/service-page/team-effectiveness-consultancy?referral=service_list_widget

Creation EQ Development ™

https://www.creationintl.com/services?category=4b800675-6a10-45e2-8c02-b83b28b7212c

Online Coaching Sessions

https://www.creationintl.com/service-page/online-coaching-sessions?referral=service_list_widget