The Complete Guide to Emotional Intelligence in the Workplace
Updated: Aug 1

An executive guide to self-awareness, emotional regulation, empathy, relationships and sustainable performance
Creation International is a UAE-based leadership and organizational development consultancy helping organizations across the GCC strengthen leadership capability, management effectiveness, team performance and workplace culture.
Contents
1. Executive Introduction
2. What Is Emotional Intelligence in the Workplace?
3. Why Emotional Intelligence Matters
4. Common Organizational Challenges
5. A Practical Framework: The CLEAR Model
6. Best Practices
7. Common Misconceptions
8. Measuring Success
9. Frequently Asked Questions
10. Key Takeaways
11. About Creation International
How to use this guide Use the framework to diagnose emotional and relational patterns before selecting training, coaching or organizational interventions. Emotional intelligence is most effective when it is connected to real roles, decisions, relationships and business outcomes. |
1. Executive Introduction
Emotional intelligence in the workplace is the capacity to recognize, understand and manage emotions one’s own and those of other people in ways that support sound judgment, constructive relationships and effective action. It is not about being agreeable, suppressing difficult feelings or avoiding accountability. It is about using emotional information intelligently so that people can communicate clearly, respond rather than react, handle pressure, navigate conflict and make decisions without allowing unmanaged emotion to distort behaviour.
For organizations, emotional intelligence matters because work is never purely technical. Strategic priorities are interpreted by people. Decisions are influenced by trust, confidence, fear, status, identity and past experience. Teams succeed or fail through the quality of everyday interactions: how leaders listen, how managers give feedback, how colleagues respond to disagreement, and whether people feel safe enough to raise risks before they become costly problems.
In GCC organizations, where teams may be highly diverse in nationality, language, professional background and working style, emotional intelligence supports respectful collaboration without stereotyping differences. It helps leaders create clarity across cultures, adapt their communication, and maintain professional standards while recognizing that people may interpret tone, hierarchy, directness and disagreement differently.
Organizations should care because emotional intelligence influences leadership credibility, employee engagement, customer experience, conflict, change adoption, retention and execution. Technical competence remains essential, but technical expertise alone does not ensure that a leader can build trust, calm a tense situation, challenge poor performance constructively or mobilize people around a shared goal. Emotional intelligence turns knowledge and authority into behaviour that others can understand, trust and follow.
Direct answer Workplace emotional intelligence is a practical performance capability. It improves how people interpret situations, regulate reactions, understand others and choose behaviour that advances both relationships and results. |
2. What Is Emotional Intelligence in the Workplace?
A practical definition
Emotional intelligence is the ability to notice emotional signals, make sense of them, regulate responses and use that awareness to behave effectively. In the workplace, this means understanding how emotion affects attention, communication, motivation, judgment and relationships and taking responsibility for the impact of one’s behaviour.
Well-established models describe emotional intelligence through related capabilities such as self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, empathy and relationship management. Some assessment frameworks also include adaptability, stress tolerance, assertiveness, decision-making and general well-being. The labels vary, but the central principle is consistent: emotions contain information, and effective professionals learn to interpret that information without being controlled by it.
What emotional intelligence is and is not
Emotional intelligence is | Emotional intelligence is not |
Recognizing emotional patterns and triggers | Being calm or positive all the time |
Managing reactions while remaining authentic | Suppressing emotion or pretending not to care |
Understanding another person’s perspective | Agreeing with everyone or excusing poor behaviour |
Communicating difficult messages constructively | Avoiding conflict to preserve harmony |
Balancing empathy with standards and accountability | Choosing relationships over performance |
Adapting behaviour to the situation | Changing personality to please others |
Why organizations invest in it
Organizations invest in emotional intelligence because it strengthens the human capabilities through which strategy is executed. Typical applications include leadership development, first-time manager programs, executive coaching, team effectiveness, conflict management, customer-facing roles, change leadership, succession planning and culture transformation.
The strongest investments are not generic workshops. They begin with a defined business context for example, managers avoiding difficult conversations, leaders becoming defensive under challenge, cross-functional teams blaming one another, or customer-facing employees struggling to remain composed. Emotional intelligence development then targets the specific behavioural capabilities required for better performance.
3. Why Emotional Intelligence Matters
Business impact
Emotional intelligence affects business performance through the quality of decisions and interactions. Leaders with stronger self-awareness are more likely to notice when confidence is becoming overconfidence, when urgency is producing unnecessary pressure, or when personal preferences are being mistaken for objective facts. Teams with stronger relational capability surface concerns earlier, resolve disagreements faster and coordinate more effectively across functions.
The commercial consequences can include fewer avoidable conflicts, stronger client relationships, better service recovery, more effective negotiations and more reliable execution. Emotional intelligence does not replace technical systems, role clarity or good governance. It improves how people use those systems when pressure, ambiguity or disagreement is present.
People impact
Employees experience emotional intelligence through everyday management behaviour. A manager who listens before judging, gives specific feedback, explains decisions and responds consistently creates a more predictable work environment. Predictability supports trust. Trust makes it easier for people to ask questions, admit mistakes, request support and contribute ideas.
Conversely, emotionally reactive leadership produces uncertainty. Team members spend energy reading the leader’s mood, protecting themselves, delaying difficult messages or seeking informal workarounds. This creates hidden coordination costs and can reduce engagement even when formal policies appear strong.
Leadership impact
Leadership is partly an emotional process because leaders influence how people interpret events. During pressure, change or uncertainty, employees watch not only what leaders say but how they say it. Composure, empathy and transparency can reduce unnecessary anxiety while preserving urgency. Acknowledging concern does not weaken leadership; it demonstrates that the leader understands reality and can still provide direction.
Organizational impact
At organizational level, emotional intelligence supports healthier norms around communication, disagreement and accountability. It contributes to psychological safety when people can raise concerns without humiliation, and to performance discipline when managers can challenge behaviour without becoming aggressive or avoidant. The outcome is not a conflict-free workplace. It is a workplace that can use disagreement productively and recover from tension more quickly.
Area | Low-EI pattern | Higher-EI pattern | Likely organizational effect |
Decision-making | Defensiveness, impulsivity, confirmation bias | Pause, perspective-taking, evidence review | Better judgment under pressure |
Feedback | Avoidance or personal criticism | Specific, timely, respectful challenge | Faster performance improvement |
Conflict | Blame, escalation or silence | Issue focus, emotional regulation, repair | Lower friction and stronger collaboration |
Change | Dismissal of concern or over-reassurance | Acknowledgement, clarity and involvement | Stronger trust and adoption |
Customer experience | Taking frustration personally | Composure, empathy and problem-solving | Better service recovery and loyalty |
4. Common Organizational Challenges
Treating emotional intelligence as a personality topic
A common mistake is to frame emotional intelligence as a personal preference or a soft trait. This makes it feel optional and difficult to connect with performance. The stronger approach defines observable behaviours: pausing before responding, asking clarifying questions, naming concerns without blame, adapting communication, giving balanced feedback and recovering after conflict.
Training without diagnosis
Organizations sometimes select emotional intelligence training because communication feels poor, without identifying what is actually happening. The root cause may be unclear decision rights, inconsistent leadership, unrealistic workload, low trust, weak management skills or unresolved conflict. Training may help, but it cannot compensate for structural problems that remain unchanged.
Confusing empathy with agreement
Some managers fear that empathy will weaken authority. In reality, empathy means understanding another person’s perspective and emotional state; it does not require agreement. A leader can understand why an employee is frustrated and still uphold a deadline, policy or performance expectation.
Focusing only on self-awareness
Insight is valuable but insufficient. A leader may know that pressure makes them impatient and still continue interrupting people. Development requires practice, feedback and accountability so that awareness becomes a different behavioural choice.
Ignoring the organizational environment
People regulate emotion more effectively when expectations, roles and processes are clear. Chronic ambiguity, contradictory priorities or a punitive culture can trigger defensive behaviour even among capable individuals. Emotional intelligence development should therefore consider both individual capability and the conditions in which people work.
Warning signs
· Difficult messages are delayed until problems become serious.
· Meetings appear polite, but concerns are discussed privately afterwards.
· Leaders respond defensively to challenge or bad news.
· Employees personalize disagreement and avoid direct conversation.
· Cross-functional teams blame one another instead of clarifying dependencies.
· Managers provide vague praise but little developmental feedback.
· Customer frustration quickly becomes employee frustration.
· People describe the culture through leaders’ moods rather than shared standards.
5. A Practical Framework: The CLEAR Model
Creation International’s CLEAR framework provides a practical way to build emotional intelligence as a workplace capability. It moves from awareness to action and can be applied to leadership, management, teamwork, conflict, customer service and change.
Stage | Core question | Workplace application |
C — Check | What am I noticing in myself and the situation? | Identify emotion, physical signals, assumptions and triggers. |
L — Label | What is the emotion and what information might it contain? | Name the feeling accurately and separate fact from interpretation. |
E — Explore | What might others be experiencing or needing? | Seek perspective, context and unspoken concerns without assuming. |
A — Align | What outcome, value or standard should guide my response? | Reconnect with purpose, role, relationship and organizational expectations. |
R — Respond | What behaviour is most constructive now? | Choose language, timing, tone and action deliberately; review the impact. |
Stage 1: Check
Before responding, notice what is happening internally. Emotional reactions often appear first as physical signals: tension, faster speech, withdrawal, irritation or urgency. The goal is not to judge the reaction but to create enough awareness to prevent an automatic response.
· What emotion am I experiencing?
· What triggered it?
· What story am I telling myself?
· What evidence supports that story?
· What could I be missing?
Stage 2: Label
Accurate emotional language improves regulation. Saying “I am stressed” may be too broad. The emotion could be frustration because progress is slow, anxiety because information is incomplete, embarrassment because credibility feels threatened, or disappointment because a commitment was not met. Accurate labels help identify the real issue and the appropriate response.
Stage 3: Explore
Emotional intelligence includes curiosity about other people. Explore rather than assume. Ask what they are seeing, what concerns them, what constraints they face and how they interpreted the situation. Listening does not require surrendering judgment; it improves the quality of information on which judgment is based.
Stage 4: Align
Reconnect the situation to what matters. The guiding reference may be the business objective, customer promise, leadership value, team standard or desired relationship. Alignment prevents short-term emotional relief from replacing long-term effectiveness. For example, avoiding feedback may reduce discomfort today but damage performance and trust later.
Stage 5: Respond
Choose the response deliberately. Decide whether to speak now or later, ask a question or make a statement, address the issue privately or collectively, and how direct the message should be. After the interaction, review the impact. Emotional intelligence improves through cycles of action, feedback and reflection not through insight alone.
Example: a missed deadline
A department head receives a late deliverable and immediately assumes the manager is careless. Using CLEAR, the leader notices irritation and urgency, labels the concern as frustration and risk, explores the manager’s context, discovers an unresolved dependency, aligns the conversation with accountability and cross-functional coordination, and responds by clarifying ownership, escalation rules and the revised deadline. The leader remains firm but avoids turning a process failure into a personal accusation.
6. Best Practices
Connect emotional intelligence to real work
Use live leadership situations, not generic scenarios. Participants should apply emotional intelligence to performance conversations, stakeholder pressure, conflict, customer complaints, change communication and difficult decisions. Relevance increases transfer.
Define observable behaviours
Translate broad competencies into actions that can be practiced and assessed. Examples include summarizing before responding, checking assumptions, naming impact without blame, asking for another perspective, managing tone under pressure and agreeing on next steps.
Use assessment responsibly
Validated self-report and multi-rater tools can create useful insight, but results should not be treated as permanent labels or used to rank people simplistically. Assessment is most valuable when interpreted with context, supported by qualified feedback and linked to development goals.
Build manager reinforcement
Managers shape whether new behaviour survives after training. Provide conversation guides, observation checklists and coaching questions. Encourage managers to notice and reinforce specific improvements, such as calmer responses, better listening or earlier escalation of concerns.
Combine learning methods
A strong development journey may include assessment, workshops, simulations, peer practice, reflection, coaching and workplace assignments. Emotional intelligence is behavioural and relational, so practice and feedback are essential.
Model it at senior level
Leaders cannot credibly ask employees to be open, reflective and accountable while senior behaviour rewards defensiveness or blame. Executives should model curiosity, acknowledge mistakes, invite challenge and remain consistent under pressure.
Respect cultural and individual differences
Communication style, emotional expression and expectations about hierarchy differ across individuals and contexts. Avoid stereotyping. Encourage people to clarify preferences, interpret behaviour cautiously and focus on shared professional standards.
Integrate emotional intelligence with systems
Embed relevant behaviours into leadership frameworks, performance expectations, succession criteria, onboarding, team charters and customer standards. This helps emotional intelligence become part of how work is done rather than a one-time learning topic.
7. Common Misconceptions
Misconception | Why it is inaccurate |
Emotionally intelligent people are always calm. | They still experience strong emotion; the difference is how they interpret and manage it. |
High empathy makes leaders too soft. | Empathy improves understanding. Accountability determines the standard and consequence. |
Emotional intelligence is fixed. | Many component behaviours can be strengthened through reflection, practice, feedback and coaching. |
It matters only in people-facing roles. | Any role involving decisions, collaboration, pressure or influence benefits from it. |
Self-awareness is enough. | Awareness creates choice, but performance improves only when behaviour changes. |
Emotional intelligence eliminates conflict. | It supports constructive conflict, not the absence of disagreement. |
A high assessment score guarantees good leadership. | Leadership also requires judgment, competence, ethics, courage and organizational understanding. |
Training alone will change culture. | Culture changes when leadership behaviour, systems, incentives and norms reinforce the same expectations. |
8. Measuring Success
Emotional intelligence should be measured through a combination of learning, behaviour and organizational outcomes. No single score proves success. The evaluation design should match the business problem the organization intended to address.
1. Capability indicators
· Improved self-awareness of triggers and behavioural impact.
· Greater confidence in difficult conversations.
· Better ability to recognize emotional cues and different perspectives.
· Stronger knowledge of regulation, feedback and conflict techniques.
2. Behavioural indicators
· Leaders pause and ask questions before reacting.
· Managers address performance issues earlier and more specifically.
· Teams challenge ideas without personalizing disagreement.
· Employees recover more quickly after tense interactions.
· Customer-facing staff maintain composure and empathy during service recovery.
3. Business and organizational indicators
· Reduced escalation of interpersonal conflict.
· Improved employee engagement or manager-effectiveness scores.
· Stronger retention in critical teams.
· Faster resolution of cross-functional issues.
· Improved customer satisfaction or complaint recovery.
· Higher change adoption and clearer communication during transitions.
A practical evaluation approach
Timing | Method | Purpose |
Before development | Self-assessment, manager input, selected performance data | Establish baseline and define priority situations. |
End of learning | Knowledge checks, simulations, confidence and action plans | Confirm understanding and readiness to apply. |
30–60 days | Self-reflection, manager observation, coaching review | Assess early application and remove barriers. |
90 days and beyond | Multi-rater feedback, behavioural evidence, business indicators | Evaluate sustained change and organizational contribution. |
Established evaluation models can help organize evidence across reaction, learning, behaviour and results. However, the quality of measurement depends on defining intended behaviour in advance. A general question such as “Did communication improve?” is weaker than observing whether managers now acknowledge emotion, clarify facts, ask for perspective and agree on accountable next steps during difficult conversations.
9. Frequently Asked Questions
1. What are the main components of emotional intelligence?
Most workplace models include self-awareness, self-management, social awareness or empathy, and relationship management. Self-awareness is the ability to recognize emotions, triggers, patterns and impact. Self-management is the ability to regulate reactions, remain adaptable and act consistently with values and goals. Social awareness involves understanding other people’s perspectives, emotions and context. Relationship management turns that awareness into effective communication, influence, feedback, conflict resolution and collaboration. Some frameworks also include assertiveness, stress tolerance, decision-making and well-being. Organizations should focus less on debating labels and more on defining the behaviours required in specific roles.
2. Can emotional intelligence be developed?
Yes. Emotional intelligence includes skills and behavioural habits that can improve through focused practice. Development usually begins with accurate feedback and reflection, followed by practice in real situations. A manager may learn to notice defensiveness, pause, ask a clarifying question and separate the issue from the person. Repetition and feedback gradually make the new response more reliable. Development is stronger when the work environment reinforces it through manager coaching, clear standards and opportunities to apply the skill. Personality may influence a person’s natural style, but it does not prevent meaningful improvement in awareness, regulation, empathy or relationship behaviour.
3. Is emotional intelligence more important than IQ or technical competence?
Emotional intelligence should not be positioned as a replacement for cognitive ability, expertise or professional judgment. Organizations need all of them. Technical competence helps a person understand the work; cognitive ability supports analysis and learning; emotional intelligence helps the person use those capabilities effectively with others and under pressure. The relative importance varies by role. A specialist may rely heavily on technical depth, while an executive must also influence, manage ambiguity and maintain trust. The practical question is not which capability is universally more important, but which combination the role requires and where current performance is constrained.
4. How does emotional intelligence improve leadership?
It improves leadership by helping leaders understand their impact, manage pressure, interpret other people accurately and choose behaviour deliberately. Emotionally intelligent leaders are more likely to listen before deciding, communicate difficult realities without creating unnecessary fear, adapt their approach to different stakeholders and repair trust after mistakes. They can combine empathy with accountability: understanding concern while maintaining standards. This improves credibility because employees experience the leader as both human and dependable. Emotional intelligence does not guarantee ethical or strategic leadership, but it strengthens the relational and self-management capabilities through which leadership decisions are implemented.
5. What is the relationship between emotional intelligence and psychological safety?
Psychological safety is the shared belief that people can speak up, ask questions, admit mistakes or challenge ideas without being humiliated or punished for the interpersonal risk. Emotional intelligence contributes to this climate when leaders regulate defensive reactions, listen to concerns and respond constructively to bad news. Team members also need emotional skills to raise issues respectfully and disagree without attacking. However, psychological safety is not created by individual capability alone. Reporting processes, leader behaviour, workload, fairness and organizational consequences all matter. Emotional intelligence supports psychological safety, but it must be reinforced by consistent systems and norms.
6. Does emotional intelligence reduce conflict?
It can reduce unnecessary or destructive conflict, but it should not eliminate productive disagreement. Healthy organizations need people to challenge assumptions, identify risk and debate priorities. Emotional intelligence helps keep the disagreement focused on the issue rather than identity or blame. People become better able to recognize escalation, regulate tone, understand interests, clarify misunderstandings and repair relationships. As a result, conflict may be addressed earlier and resolved more effectively. A workplace with no visible conflict may actually have avoidance or fear. The goal is not silence; it is constructive conflict that improves decisions without damaging trust.
7. How should emotional intelligence be assessed?
Assessment should use methods appropriate to the purpose. Self-report tools can support reflection, while multi-rater or 360-degree feedback adds information about how behaviour is experienced by others. Interviews, simulations and behavioural observation can provide further context. Assessment should be administered and interpreted responsibly, with confidentiality, qualified feedback and clear development goals. Results should not be treated as fixed labels, diagnostic judgments or simple promotion scores. The most useful assessment connects patterns to real situations for example, how a leader responds to challenge, gives feedback, manages stress or engages stakeholders and then identifies practical development actions.
8. What is the difference between empathy and emotional intelligence?
Empathy is one component of emotional intelligence. It is the ability to understand another person’s feelings, perspective or experience. Emotional intelligence is broader: it also includes awareness of one’s own emotions, regulation of reactions, adaptability, decision-making and the ability to manage relationships effectively. A person can be highly empathetic but struggle to set boundaries, give difficult feedback or manage personal stress. Conversely, a person may regulate emotions well but fail to understand others. Effective workplace performance requires balanced capability: empathy informed by judgment, standards and appropriate action.
9. How can managers use emotional intelligence in performance conversations?
Managers can begin by preparing both facts and emotional intent. They should identify the specific behaviour or result, anticipate their own triggers, and enter the conversation with the purpose of improvement rather than punishment. During the discussion, they can describe observations clearly, explain impact, ask for the employee’s perspective and listen without abandoning the standard. They should acknowledge emotion without allowing it to derail accountability, then agree on actions, support and follow-up. Emotional intelligence improves the quality of the conversation, but it does not replace documentation, fairness or performance-management processes.
10. How does emotional intelligence support change management?
Change creates uncertainty, loss of control and different emotional reactions. Emotionally intelligent leaders recognize these responses without categorizing all resistance as negativity. They communicate honestly, listen for practical and emotional concerns, explain what is known and unknown, and adapt messages for different stakeholders. They also regulate their own frustration when progress is slower than expected. This builds trust and gives leaders better information about barriers to adoption. Emotional intelligence does not remove the need for clear governance, resources and implementation planning; it improves how leaders mobilize people through those systems.
11. How long does emotional intelligence development take?
Awareness can increase quickly, but dependable behavioural change usually requires sustained application over several months. The timeline depends on the capability, the person’s motivation, the quality of feedback and the work environment. A short workshop may introduce concepts and tools. Lasting improvement is more likely when followed by practice, manager reinforcement, coaching and measurement at 30, 60 and 90 days. Organizations should avoid promising transformation from a single event. A development journey should establish a baseline, target a small number of high-value behaviours, create repeated practice and review evidence of change.
12. What should an emotional intelligence programme include?
A strong programme should include a clear business rationale, relevant assessment or diagnostic evidence, practical concepts, realistic workplace scenarios, skills practice, reflection and post-programme application. Depending on the audience, it may cover triggers, emotional vocabulary, regulation, empathy, listening, feedback, conflict, resilience and relationship management. Leaders may also benefit from individual coaching or 360-degree feedback. The programme should define expected behaviours and how managers will reinforce them. Content should be adapted to role, sector, seniority and organizational context rather than delivered as a generic personal-development course.
13. Can emotional intelligence be overused or manipulated?
Any interpersonal capability can be used poorly. A person may read emotions accurately but use that insight to influence people for self-serving purposes. This is why emotional intelligence should be connected to ethics, organizational values and accountability. It is also possible to overemphasize harmony, empathy or emotional processing at the expense of timely decisions. Balanced emotional intelligence uses awareness to support responsible action, not manipulation or avoidance. Organizations should evaluate both impact and intent: whether leaders use relational skill to create clarity, fairness and sustainable performance.
14. How is emotional intelligence relevant to multicultural GCC workplaces?
GCC organizations often include employees and stakeholders from many national, linguistic and professional backgrounds. Emotional intelligence supports effective collaboration by encouraging curiosity, perspective-taking and careful interpretation rather than assumption. It helps leaders adapt directness, pace, feedback and meeting behaviour while maintaining shared standards. The aim is not to assign fixed behaviours to cultures. Individuals vary widely. Leaders should ask, observe and clarify preferences, particularly around hierarchy, disagreement, recognition and decision-making. This combination of cultural humility and emotional intelligence reduces misunderstanding and strengthens inclusion.
15. When is training not the right solution?
Training is not sufficient when poor behaviour is mainly caused or reinforced by structural conditions. Examples include unclear roles, contradictory priorities, excessive workload, weak governance, inconsistent consequences, unresolved leadership conflict or a culture that punishes speaking up. In these cases, emotional intelligence development may still be useful, but it should be part of a broader intervention. Diagnosis should determine whether the priority is capability, process, leadership alignment, role clarity, policy, workload or culture. The principle is simple: do not ask people to regulate themselves around organizational problems that leaders have not addressed.
10. Key Takeaways
· Emotional intelligence is the ability to use emotional information to support effective judgment, behaviour and relationships.
· It is not about suppressing emotion, being agreeable or avoiding accountability.
· Its value appears in leadership, decision-making, feedback, conflict, change, teamwork and customer experience.
· Self-awareness is only the beginning; development must translate insight into observable behaviour.
· Empathy and accountability are complementary: leaders can understand people while maintaining standards.
· Training should follow diagnosis because communication problems may have structural or leadership root causes.
· The CLEAR model Check, Label, Explore, Align and Respond, provides a practical process for emotionally intelligent action.
· Assessment should be used responsibly and connected to real roles and workplace situations.
· Sustainable improvement requires practice, feedback, manager reinforcement and measurement over time.
· Organizational culture strengthens when leaders model openness, regulation, constructive challenge and repair.
11. About Creation International
Creation International approaches emotional intelligence as a leadership and organizational capability, not simply a personal-development topic. The starting point is diagnosis: understanding the business context, the critical relationships involved, the behaviours currently affecting performance and the organizational conditions that reinforce them.
Interventions are then tailored to the audience and need. Depending on the context, this may include leadership workshops, team development, executive coaching, behavioural practice, self-assessment, EQ-i 2.0® or EQ 360® feedback, manager reinforcement tools and post-programme evaluation. The objective is to help people apply emotional intelligence to the situations that matter most difficult conversations, pressure, conflict, decision-making, change and collaboration.
Evidence-based practice means using established concepts, responsible assessment and observable behavioural outcomes rather than exaggerated claims. Sustainable capability development means extending learning beyond the event through application, feedback and follow-up. In this way, emotional intelligence becomes part of how leaders lead, managers manage and teams work together.

Comments